In part 3 of the legal economic nexus, Samuels gets to the heart of the matter by applying his new approach or thinking about implications. This is arguably also the trickiest part of the paper for him to navigate. The section starts with a declaration of the need for “objectivity”. Of course, there will be many who say this is an impossible standard for humans to achieve as every person brings some set of experiences and bias to how they do the work and even the questions they ask or things are interesting to answer. Certainly, there are a number of institutional economists who would claim that the subjective-objective dichotomy is a false and impractical one. Leaving those arguments aside for the moment, let's explore what Samuels was trying to do here. His main point is he wants to move beyond the power contestations of lawyers or economists as they try to influence the nexus. He states that there are those who would pretend to be objective but in...
Comments
Post a Comment